Elville and Associates

Blog / Blog

Tax Provisions in the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021

spring-21-newsletter-restaurant-owner-check-article-150x150

The American Rescue Plan of 2021 is designed to provide economic relief to millions of Americans in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition to "stimulus" payments, the Plan includes several lesser-known tax provisions. Understanding how they may affect you can help your income tax planning and withholdings in 2021 and beyond.

Tax Changes for Individuals

Exclusion of Unemployment Benefits from Income

Under the American Rescue Plan of 2021, as of the 2020 tax year, if the adjusted gross income (AGI) of the taxpayer for the tax year is less than $150,000, the gross income of the taxpayer does not include so much of the unemployment compensation received by the taxpayer (or, in the case of a joint return, received by each spouse) as does not exceed $10,200.

Checkmark Observation. New Code Sec. 85(c) does not provide for a phase-out based on AGI. Therefore, if a taxpayer makes $150,000 or more, the exclusion does not apply, and all the individual’s unemployment compensation would be included in gross income.

The same $150,000 limit applies to returns filed jointly, as head of household, or with single status. However, in the case of a joint return, the $10,200 exclusion applies separately to each spouse.

Some taxpayers already filed their returns before the passage of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. If these taxpayers included unemployment compensation in their gross income, they should file amended returns if they qualify for the exclusion.

Under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, an eligible individual is allowed an income tax credit for 2021 equal to the sum of: (1) $1,400 ($2,800 for eligible individuals filing a joint return) plus (2) $1,400 for each dependent of the taxpayer. The credit is refundable. For purposes of the credit, an "eligible individual" is any individual other than a nonresident alien or an individual who is a dependent of another taxpayer for the tax year. Estates and trusts aren't eligible for the credit.

The amount of the credit is ratably reduced (but not below zero) for taxpayers with adjusted gross income (AGI) of over: $150,000 for a joint return; $112,500 for a head of household; and $75,000 for all other taxpayers.

The credit is completely phased out (reduced to zero) for taxpayers with AGI of over: $160,000 for a joint return; $120,000 for a head of household; and $80,000 for all other taxpayers. (Code Sec. 6428B(d), as added by ARPA Sec. 9601(a))

Changes to the Child Tax Credit

Before the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, the child tax credit (CTC) was $2,000 per “qualifying child.” A qualifying child was defined as an under age 17 child, whom the taxpayer could claim as a dependent (i.e., a child related to the taxpayer who, generally, lived with the taxpayer for at least six months during the year), and who was a U.S. citizen or national, or a U.S. resident.

Under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, for tax year 2021 the CTC is temporarily expanded as to eligibility, and amount, as follows:

1. The definition of a qualifying child is broadened to include a child who hasn’t turned 18 by the end of 2021.

2. The CTC is increased to $3,000 per child ($3,600 for children under age 6 as of the close of the year). But, the increased credit amounts are phased out at modified AGI of over $75,000 for singles, $112,500 for heads-of-households, and $150,000 for joint filers and surviving spouses. at a rate of $50 for each $1,000 (or fraction thereof) of modified AGI over the applicable threshold.

This phaseout is limited—so that it only applies to the temporarily increased amounts for 2021 (i.e., to $1,600 per child under age six, and $1,000 per child age six or older), and doesn’t apply to the $2,000 of CTC permitted under existing law. After applying this phaseout, the taxpayer’s $2,000 of CTC is subject to the phaseout rules under existing law.

3. The CTC is fully refundable for 2021 for a taxpayer (either spouse for a joint return) with a principal place of abode in the U.S. for more than one-half of the tax year, or for a taxpayer who is a bona fide resident of Puerto Rico for the tax year. That is, refundability will be determined without regard to either the earned income, or alternative, formula.

Child and Dependent Care Credit Enhanced and Made Refundable

An individual taxpayer who has one or more qualifying individuals (certain dependents) may qualify to receive a credit for expenses the taxpayer paid (“employment-related expenses”) for the care of the qualifying individual(s) so that the taxpayer can be gainfully employed.

Before the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, the expenses considered in determining the credit couldn't exceed $3,000 for one qualifying individual or $6,000 for more than one. Before ARPA, the credit was 35% of employment-related expenses for taxpayers whose adjusted gross income (AGI) for the tax year was $15,000 or less. So, the maximum credit was $1,050 ($3,000 x 35%) if there was one qualifying individual and $2,100 ($6,000 x 35%) if there were two or more qualifying individuals.

The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 makes several child and dependent care credit changes that apply for tax years that begin in 2021. The child and dependent care credit is refundable for taxpayers who have a principal place of abode in the U.S. for more than one-half of the tax year.

Increase in limits

For tax years beginning in 2021, the dollar limit on the amount taken into account is increased to $8,000 (from $3,000) if there is one qualifying individual with respect to the taxpayer, or $16,000 (from $6,000) if there are two or more qualifying individuals with respect to the taxpayer.

The applicable percentage is increased to 50%, reduced by one percentage point for each $2,000 (or fraction thereof) by which the taxpayer’s AGI for the tax year exceeds $125,000. Thus, for taxpayers with AGI of $125,000 or less, the maximum amount of the credit is $4,000 ($8,000 x 50%) for taxpayers with one qualifying individual and $8,000 ($16,000 x 50%) for taxpayers with two or more qualifying individuals. The applicable percentage is not reduced below the “phaseout percentage;” the phaseout percentage is 20% reduced (but not below zero) by one percentage for each $2,000 (or fraction thereof) by which the taxpayer’s AGI for the tax year exceeds $400,000.

Therefore, the applicable percentage is 50% for taxpayers with AGI of $125,000 or below. The applicable percentage decreases one percentage point for every $2,000 by which the taxpayer’s AGI exceeds $125,000 until AGI reaches $185,000. The applicable percentage is 20% for taxpayers with AGI greater than $185,000 but not greater than $400,000. For taxpayers with AGI above $400,000, the applicable percentage again decreases one percentage point for every $2,000. Thus, for taxpayers with AGI greater than $440,000, the credit is phased out completely.

Student Loan Discharges

The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 excludes from gross income certain discharges of student loans after December 31, 2020, and before January 1, 2026. The “student loan discharge” exclu­sion applies to these types of loans:

1. Loans provided expressly for post-secondary educational expenses if the loan was made, insured, or guaranteed by a federal, state, or local governmental entity or an eligible educational institution.

2. Private education loans.

3. Any loan made by any educational institution qualifying as a 50% charity (for purposes of the income tax charitable deduction) if the loan is made under an agreement with any governmental entity or any private education lender that provided the loan to the educational organization, or under a program of the educational institution that is designed to encourage its students to serve in occupations with unmet needs or in areas with unmet needs and under which the services provided by the students (or former students) are for or under the direction of a governmental unit or a tax-exempt charitable organization.

4. Any loan made by an educational organization qualifying as a 50% charity or by an tax-exempt organization to refinance a loan to an individual to assist the individual in attending any educational organization but only if the refinancing loan is under a program of the refinancing organization

But, the discharge of a loan made by either an educational institution or a private education lender is not excluded under the above rules if the discharge is on account of services performed for either the organization or for the private education lender.

Tax Changes for Businesses

COBRA Premium Subsidy

Assistance-eligible individuals (AEIs) may receive a 100% subsidy for COBRA premiums for any period of COBRA coverage during the period beginning on April 1, 2021 (the first day of the first month beginning after enactment) and ending on September 30, 2021. An AEI is a COBRA qualified beneficiary (i.e., employee, former employee, covered spouse, or covered dependent) who, with respect to a period of coverage during the period beginning on April 1, 2021, and ending on September 30, 2021, is eligible for and elects COBRA coverage due to a qualifying event of involuntary termination of employment or reduction of hours.

Extended election period

Individuals who do not have a COBRA election in effect on April 1, 2021, but who would be an AEI if they did, are eligible for the subsidy. In addition, individuals who elected but discontinued COBRA coverage before April 1, 2021, are eligible if they would otherwise be an AEI and are still within their maximum period of coverage. Individuals meeting these criteria may make a COBRA election during the period beginning on April 1, 2021 and ending 60 days after they are provided required notification of the extended election period.

COBRA coverage elected during the extended election period will commence with the first period of coverage beginning on or after April 1, 2021 and may not extend beyond the AEI’s original maximum period of coverage.

The subsidy is available for any period of coverage during the period beginning on April 1, 2021 and ending on September 30, 2021. However, eligibility may end earlier if the qualified beneficiary’s maximum period of coverage ends before September 30, 2021, or if the qualified beneficiary becomes eligible for coverage under another group health plan (other than coverage consisting of only excepted benefits, or coverage under a health flexible spending arrangement or qualified small employer health reimbursement arrangement) or Medicare.

Group health plan sponsors may, but are not required to, allow AEIs to elect to enroll in different coverage. Enrollment must occur within 90 days after the date of notice informing the individual of the enrollment option. Enrollment in different coverage may be permitted only if:

1. The premium does not exceed the premium for the coverage in which the individual was enrolled at the time of the qualifying event.

2. The different coverage is also offered to similarly situated active employees at the time of the election, and

3. The different coverage is not coverage that provides only excepted benefits, or is a qualified small employer health reimbursement arrangement or health flexible spending arrangement.

AEIs must notify the group health plan if they cease to be eligible for the subsidy because they become eligible for another group health plan or Medicare. Notices must be provided in the time and manner specified by the Department of Labor.

Penalties of $250 (or more for intentional failures) may be assessed for failure to provide such notification. No penalties will be assessed for failures due to reasonable cause and not to willful neglect.

Group health plans must provide the following notices to AEIs:

1. Notice of assistance availability. Informs AEIs of the availability of the subsidy and the option to enroll in different coverage (if permitted by the employer). Must be provided to individuals who become eligible to elect COBRA during the period beginning on April 1, 2021 and ending on September 30, 2021. This notice requirement may be met by amending existing notices or including a separate document along with them. Specific content requirements apply.

2. Notice of extended election period. Must be provided to individuals eligible for an extended election period within 60 days after April 1, 2021.

3. Notice of expiration of subsidy. Must be provided between 45 and 15 days before the date on which an individual’s subsidy will expire, unless the subsidy is expiring because the individual has gained eligibility for coverage under another group health plan or Medicare. (ARPA Sec. 9501(a)(6))

Within 30 days of enactment, the Department of Labor is to issue model notices which can be used to notify eligible individuals of the availability of assistance and the availability of an extended enrollment period. Within 45 days, the Department is to issue model notices regarding the expiration of the subsidy.

Employers will be allowed a quarterly tax credit against the Medicare payroll tax equal to the premium amounts not paid by AEIs. If the credit amount exceeds the quarterly Medicare payroll tax, the excess will be treated as a refundable overpayment. The quarterly credit may be paid in advance according to forms and instructions to be provided by the Department of Labor.

AEIs are not eligible for the health coverage tax credit (HCTC) for any period of coverage in which they receive a COBRA subsidy. Subsidy amounts will not be included in the gross income of AEIs.

Increase in the Exclusion for Employer-Provided Dependent Care Assistance

For 2021 only, the exclusion for employer-provided dependent care assistance is increased from $5,000 to $10,500, and from $2,500 to $5,250 in the case of a separate return filed by a married individual.

Targeted Economic Injury Disaster Loan Advances

Under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, eligible small businesses may receive targeted economic injury disaster loan (EIDL) advances from the Small Business Administration. Amounts received as targeted EIDL advances are not included in the gross income of the person who receives the amounts.

No deduction or basis increase is denied, and no tax attribute is reduced by reason of the gross income exclusion.

In the case of a partnership or S corporation that receives targeted EIDL advances, any amount of the advance excluded from income is treated as tax-exempt income. Since the targeted EIDL advances are treated as tax-exempt income, they will be allocated to the partners or shareholders and increase their bases in their partnership interests. Under the single-class-of-stock rule, shareholders receive allocations of tax-exempt income from the targeted EIDL advances in proportion to their ownership interest in the S corporation.

Restaurant Revitalization Grants

Under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, eligible restaurants, food trucks, and similar businesses may receive restaurant revitalization grants from the Small Business Administration. Amounts received as restaurant revitalization grants are not included in the gross income of the person who receives the amounts. No deduction or basis increase is denied, and no tax attribute is reduced by reason of the gross income exclusion.

In the case of a partnership or S corporation that receives a restaurant revitalization grant, any amount of the grant excluded from income is treated as tax-exempt income. Since the restaurant revitalization grants are treated as tax-exempt income, they will be allocated to the partners or shareholders and increase their bases in their partnership interests. Under the single-class-of-stock rule, shareholders receive allocations of tax-exempt income from the restaurant revitalization grants in proportion to their ownership interest in the S corporation.

Expansion of Rule on Deduction of Compensation of Publicly Held Corporation Employees

A publicly held corporation's compensation deduction is limited to $1 million per year for compensation paid to any “covered employee.” For tax years that begin after December 31, 2026, the above rule is changed to provide that “covered employee” includes the eight other highest-paid employees, rather than the three other highest-paid employees.

However, the above rule regarding employees who were in one of the covered employee categories in preceding years, does not apply to employees who are covered employees only because of the new rule.


Mr. Charles A. Borek is Special Counsel to Elville and Associates and Founder of The Borek Group, LLC. He is a business and tax attorney with almost 30 years of experience representing individuals, small businesses, and nonprofits. He has taught law students as a visiting professor and adjunct professor of law at American University and the University of Baltimore and has lectured at Dickinson Law School of Penn State University. Chuck has written for Thomson-Reuters, Bloomberg BNA, and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. His book on contract drafting is used by lawyers throughout Maryland and has been cited by the Maryland courts. Additionally, Chuck presents seminars to CPAs and lawyers around the country though his company, The Borek Group, LLC, including presentations to “Big 4” accounting firms and Fortune 500 companies. Mr. Borek may be reached at chuck@elvilleassociates.com, or 443-393-7696.

Posted in:

Related Posts

Thinking about a life estate in Maryland? Learn the benefits, risks, Medicaid concerns, and alternatives before adding children to your deed.

Life Estates in Maryland: When They Make Sense and When They Don’t

A life estate can be a useful planning tool for some Maryland families who want to protect a home, avoid probate, and plan ahead for the future. At the same time, life estates create permanent legal and financial consequences that are often misunderstood. Knowing when a life estate works well and when it creates long-term problems is essential before moving forward. This article explains how life estates function in Maryland, common risks families encounter, how life estates interact with Medicaid planning, and alternatives that may offer greater flexibility. What Is a Life Estate? A life estate allows more than one person to hold ownership interests in the same property at different times. In Maryland, this typically allows a parent to live in and control a home for life while naming children or other individuals to receive the property automatically after death. The person living in the home is called the life tenant. The individuals who will receive the property later are known as remaindermen. While remaindermen cannot take possession during the life tenant’s lifetime, they hold a present ownership interest in the property. Life estate deeds are often used to avoid probate, support long-term planning goals, and simplify the transfer of a home. These benefits must be balanced against the legal limitations created by the deed. When a Life Estate May Make Sense In limited situations, a life estate can serve a practical purpose. This is most common in straightforward family arrangements where a parent intends to remain in the home for life and wants the property to pass directly to a specific individual without probate. Life estates may also be considered when flexibility is not a priority and future long-term care needs are unlikely. Even in these situations, careful legal review is critical before creating the deed. When Life Estates Create Problems for Maryland Families Limits on Selling or Refinancing Once a life estate is created, the life tenant generally cannot sell or refinance the property without the consent of all remaindermen. This can create serious challenges if care needs change or the property must be sold to cover expenses. Some families explore tools such as a testamentary power of appointment or a nominee realty trust to increase flexibility, but these options require careful planning and are not appropriate in every case. Difficulty Changing Ownership Removing a remainderman from a life estate deed is far more complex than changing a beneficiary on a financial account. Once added, that ownership interest is legally significant and often cannot be undone without consent or legal action. Exposure to Remainderman Issues After a remainderman is added to the deed, their legal and financial issues may affect the property. Court judgments, tax liens, divorce proceedings, or bankruptcy can complicate ownership and create unexpected risks. If a remainderman passes away before the life tenant, their interest may pass through their estate, potentially requiring probate and introducing new parties into the ownership structure. Medicaid Look-Back Concerns Creating a life estate involves transferring a property interest. If long-term care is needed within five years of that transfer, Maryland Medicaid rules may impose a penalty period. Timing and structure matter, and mistakes can be costly. Nursing Home Recovery Risks If the home is sold while the life tenant is receiving nursing home care, the state may assert a claim against the proceeds to recover Medicaid benefits paid. This outcome often surprises families. Life Estates and Medicaid Planning in Maryland A common misconception is that a life estate automatically protects a home from Medicaid. While a life estate may avoid probate, it does not replace a comprehensive Medicaid planning strategy. Medicaid planning is highly timing-sensitive and should be coordinated with broader elder law goals. Families often benefit from reviewing life estates alongside other options discussed in our Maryland elder law resources. Alternatives That Offer Greater Flexibility Depending on family goals, other planning tools may provide better long-term outcomes. Revocable trusts, irrevocable trusts, and coordinated elder law planning strategies often allow for asset protection while preserving flexibility and control. These approaches may integrate more smoothly with Medicaid planning and incapacity planning and can reduce risk as circumstances change. Reviewing a Life Estate as Part of a Larger Plan Life estates affect more than property ownership. They influence taxes, Medicaid eligibility, and the ability to respond to future care needs. For this reason, they should always be evaluated as part of a broader estate and elder law plan rather than used in isolation. If you are considering a life estate or already have one in place, guidance from a Maryland elder law attorney can help clarify risks and identify options before a crisis occurs. To schedule a confidential consultation, contact us online, call our Columbia office at 443-339-5638, or reach our Rockville office at 240-456-1657.

small-house-150x150

Life Estates in Maryland: Benefits, Risks, and Better Planning Options

A life estate can be a helpful tool for Maryland families looking to protect their homes, avoid probate, and plan for Medicaid. It is important to understand the risks involved. This article explains common life estate issues and why careful legal planning matters before deciding if this approach fits your situation. What Is a Life Estate? A life estate allows multiple people to hold interests in the same property at different times. In Maryland, this often means a parent keeps possession and use of their home while ensuring it passes to their children without going through probate. By creating a life estate deed, families may avoid probate, reduce Medicaid exposure, and receive a step up in tax basis. The person living in the home is known as the life tenant and retains control during their lifetime. The individuals who inherit the property are the remaindermen. Although they cannot take possession until the life tenant passes away, they hold a current ownership interest. When a Life Estate May Still Be Appropriate In limited situations, a life estate can serve a practical purpose. Some families use a life estate when a parent wants to remain in the home for life and ensure the property passes directly to a specific individual without probate. This is most common in straightforward family situations where long term care needs are unlikely and flexibility is not a primary concern. Even in these cases, careful review is important. A life estate permanently alters property rights, and future changes often require agreement from all parties involved. Five Issues Maryland Families Should Know 1. Limits on Selling or Borrowing Against the Property A life tenant generally cannot sell or refinance the property without agreement from all remaindermen. A testamentary power of appointment may allow the life tenant to change who inherits the property through a will, providing additional flexibility. A nominee realty trust may allow one or more children to act as trustee for all remaindermen, with decisions made by majority vote. This can be helpful when family members disagree. 2. Difficulty Removing a Remainderman Removing a remainderman from a deed is far more complex than changing a beneficiary on a financial account. In many cases, removal is not possible without consent or court involvement. 3. Legal Issues Affecting the Property Once a remainderman is added to the deed, their financial or legal issues may affect the property. Court judgments or tax liens may attach to the home Divorce or bankruptcy can complicate ownership If a remainderman passes away before the life tenant, their estate may require probate These issues may not force the life tenant to leave the home, but they can create significant complications. 4. Medicaid Look Back Period Transferring a property interest through a life estate can affect Medicaid eligibility if long term care is needed within five years of the transfer. 5. Nursing Home Reimbursement If the property is sold while the life tenant is in a nursing home, the state may have a claim against the sale proceeds to recover care costs. Why Life Estates Often Create Long Term Challenges Many families create life estates without fully understanding the limitations involved. Selling or refinancing the property usually requires consent from the remainder beneficiary, which can become problematic if care needs change or funds are needed. Life estates also expose the property to risks tied to the remainder beneficiary. Financial hardship, divorce, or creditor claims affecting that individual can impact the property even while the life tenant continues to live there. Life Estates and Medicaid Planning in Maryland A common misconception is that a life estate automatically protects a home from Medicaid rules. While a life estate may avoid probate, it does not automatically shield the property from Medicaid eligibility requirements or recovery claims. In some situations, transferring a remainder interest can create a Medicaid penalty period if it is not structured properly or completed at the right time. Because Medicaid planning is highly timing sensitive, a life estate should never be used as a substitute for a comprehensive elder law strategy. Alternatives That Offer More Flexibility Than a Life Estate Depending on a family’s goals, other planning tools may provide better long term results. Revocable trusts, irrevocable trusts, and coordinated elder law planning strategies may offer asset protection while preserving control and adaptability. These options often integrate more effectively with Medicaid planning and incapacity planning. Choosing the right structure depends on health, family dynamics, finances, and anticipated care needs. A solution that works well for one family may create serious limitations for another. Is a Life Estate the Right Option? For some Maryland residents, life estates can provide benefits, particularly when probate avoidance is a primary goal. The risks involved mean this approach is not appropriate for every situation. Understanding both the legal and financial impact is critical. Reviewing a Life Estate as Part of a Bigger Plan Life estates affect more than property ownership. They impact taxes, Medicaid eligibility, and a family’s ability to respond to changing circumstances. For this reason, life estates should be reviewed as part of a broader estate and elder law plan rather than used alone. If you are considering a life estate or already have one in place, speaking with a Maryland elder law attorney can help clarify risks and identify options before a crisis occurs. To schedule a confidential consultation, contact us onlin e, call our Columbia office at 443-339-5638, or dial 240-456-1657 to reach our Rockville office.

 2026 Maryland Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Lists

Managing Principal Stephen Elville, Principal Attorneys Shannon Goodwin and Shannon Ladner, and Associate Attorney Sara von Stein Echeverria Honored on the 2026 Maryland Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Lists

Authored by: Jeffrey D. Stauffer – Community Relations Director It was announced on Friday, December 19 th that Managing Principal Stephen Elville, Principal Attorneys Shannon Goodwin and Shannon Ladner, and Associate Attorney Sara von Stein Echeverria were honored on the 2026 Maryland Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Lists. Stephen R. Elville, J.D., LL.M. — Managing Principal Stephen R. Elville, President, CEO, and Managing Principal of Elville & Associates, P.C., has again been selected to the 2026 Maryland Super Lawyers List — his 11th overall and 10th consecutive year receiving this recognition. Mr. Elville’s practice centers on helping individuals and families through challenging legal landscapes with clarity, compassion, and technical skill. He leads the firm’s work in estate planning, elder law, special needs planning, tax planning and asset protection and preservation, long-term care planning, and more. Clients working with Mr. Elville benefit from his deep experience navigating both pre-crisis planning and complex crisis situations — giving them peace of mind and a personalized, long-term strategy. Throughout his career, Mr. Elville has built a reputation as one of Maryland’s most respected attorneys. His broad legal-technical knowledge, combined with a caring and client-focused approach, enables him to address a wide range of legal matters with confidence and clarity. In addition to his client work, he is a seasoned educator and speaker, regularly offering webinars and workshops for clients and the surrounding community, along with continuing education events for financial advisors. Mr. Elville is an active member of several professional organizations including the National Association of Elder Law Attorneys (NAELA), WealthCounsel, the Academy of Special Needs Planners, and as well as the EPIC Peer Group where he travels around the country each quarter learning from and teaching likeminded attorneys. He has held leadership roles including the past Chair of the Estates & Trusts & Elder Law Sections of the Howard County Bar Association, past President of the Coalition of Geriatric Services (COGS), and past Chair of the Elder Law & Disability Rights Section Council of the Maryland State Bar Association. He was also the long-term Chair for Law Day Maryland and recently served as Chair of the Pro Bono Subcommittee of the Elder Law Disability Rights Section Council. Outside of his legal practice, he is President of the Friends of Baltimore Classical Music, Inc. and Founder of the Elville Center for the Creative Arts, Inc. — a nonprofit dedicated to furthering music education for students with limited means.  Mr. Elville had a feature story written about him in the national Super Lawyers Magazine about the Elville Center and his efforts surrounding this initiative. Along with his charitable endeavors, Mr. Elville also supports community organizations such as the Autism Society of Maryland, the Brain Injury Association of Maryland, the National Alliance on Mental Illness of Howard County, the Howard County Public Library System Veterans Book Group program, and more. Shannon Goodwin, J.D. — Principal Attorney Shannon Goodwin has been named to the 2026 Rising Stars List for a third consecutive year. In her role as Principal Attorney, she leads Elville and Associates’ Estate and Trust Administration Department along with estate planning and tax planning. Ms. Goodwin guides clients through every aspect of administering estates — from the probate process and inventory reporting, to accountings, final distributions, and all detailed estate tasks. Her insight and dedication help families navigate what can often be complicated and emotionally difficult processes. Her background includes undergraduate studies at North Carolina State University, followed by law school — during which she distinguished herself as a member of the Syracuse Law Review. After graduation, she gained important legal experience working as a Judicial Law Clerk for three years in the Circuit Court for Washington County, and in the District Court for Washington and Frederick Counties. She joined Elville and Associates in 2021, bringing with her a strong foundation and commitment to client care. Shannon F. Ladner, J.D. — Principal Attorney Shannon F. Ladner has earned her place on the 2026 Rising Stars List for the fourth year in a row. She leads the firm’s Estate Planning Department, where she assists clients through every stage of planning — from initial consultation to plan design and implementation, and ongoing updates as laws and life circumstances evolve. Ms. Ladner’s practice emphasizes estate planning and special needs planning. Her work is grounded in a thoughtful, client-centered approach, ensuring that each plan reflects the client’s values, goals, and unique family situation. During law school, she contributed her talents to the Human Trafficking Prevention Project Clinic, representing victims of human trafficking as a Rule 19 Student Attorney. After receiving her J.D., she served as a Judicial Law Clerk for Magistrates Susan M. Marzetta and Lori Joy Eisner in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City. Before joining Elville and Associates, she practiced at a small law firm in Towson, Maryland where she gained valuable experience representing clients in family law and criminal matters. Sara von Stein Echeverria, J.D. — Associate Attorney 2026 is Sara von Stein Echeverria’s first of what we see as many future inclusions on the Maryland Rising Stars list.  Ms. von Stein Echeverria focuses her practice on estate planning, estate and trust administration, special needs planning, asset protection, and tax planning. She is known for her thoughtful, client-centered approach and her ability to guide individuals and families through complex planning decisions with clarity, empathy, and care. Sara works closely with clients to develop comprehensive plans that protect loved ones, reflect personal values, and provide long-term peace of mind. Sara earned her Juris Doctor, summa cum laude, from the University of Baltimore School of Law, where she distinguished herself through academic excellence and legal scholarship. She also holds a Master of Science from Birkbeck College, University of London, and a Bachelor of Arts, cum laude, from Dickinson College. Prior to joining Elville and Associates, her work included humanitarian and immigration-related legal advocacy, experience that continues to inform her compassionate and inclusive approach to client service. Sara is admitted to practice in Maryland and is an active member of the Maryland State Bar Association, the American Bar Association, and the Baltimore City Bar Association. To learn more about this year’s honorees and the entire team at Elville and Associates, please visit www.elvilleassociates.com. The firm is steadfast in its commitment to client education, compassionate legal service, and providing peace-of-mind solutions across estate planning, elder law, special needs planning, and beyond. Super Lawyers, a Thomson Reuters business, is a rating service of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The annual selections are made using a patented multiphase process that includes a statewide survey of lawyers, an independent research evaluation of candidates and peer reviews by practice area. The result is a credible, comprehensive and diverse listing of exceptional attorneys. The Super Lawyers lists are published nationwide in Super Lawyers Magazines and in leading city and regional magazines and newspapers across the country. Super Lawyers Magazines also feature editorial profiles of attorneys who embody excellence in the practice of law. For more information about Super Lawyers, visit SuperLawyers.com. #elvilleeducation